{"id":17574,"date":"2026-09-21T13:25:44","date_gmt":"2026-09-21T11:25:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/davidhorn.com\/?post_type=resource-hub&p=17574"},"modified":"2026-11-03T12:47:06","modified_gmt":"2026-11-03T11:47:06","slug":"suspect-interviews-accuracy-of-written-records","status":"publish","type":"resource-hub","link":"https:\/\/davidhorn.com\/it\/resource-hub\/suspect-interviews-accuracy-of-written-records\/","title":{"rendered":"Suspect interviews: accuracy of written records."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n
\"Suspect<\/figure>\n\n\n

“Whatever You Say Will Be Taken Down in Writing”: What Handwritten Records of Suspect Interviews Leave Out<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

(Webinar with\u00a0Dr.\u00a0Adrian Gates.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fill out the form to watch the webinar.\u2028 Please fill in all required fields (*) before submitting your inquiry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this keynote, Dr. Adrian Gates<\/mark><\/strong> presents findings from his doctoral research into a question most justice systems rarely ask: how accurately do handwritten records capture what’s being said during suspect interviews? Ireland makes the question testable, because suspect interviews there are both audio-visually recorded and written down. Dr. Gates compared 15 real-world recorded suspect interviews<\/a> with the written statements produced from them. The results raise serious questions about the evidential weight given to handwritten statements. They also build an evidence-based case for putting the recording first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the webinar covers:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n